osbenchmark/metrics.py (4 lines):
	- line 56: # TODO #653: Remove version-specific support for metrics stores before 7.0.0.
	- line 67: # TODO #653: Remove version-specific support for metrics stores before 7.0.0 (also adjust template)
	- line 96: # TODO #653: Remove version-specific support for metrics stores before 7.0.0.
	- line 1361: # TODO: cluster is optional for BWC. This can be removed after some grace period.


osbenchmark/workload/workload.py (3 lines):
	- line 464: # TODO #341: Improve API to let users define what they want (everything, just specific types, ...)
	- line 472: # TODO #341: Improve API to let users define what they want (everything, just specific types, ...)
	- line 484: # TODO #341: Improve API to let users define what they want (everything, just specific types, ...)


osbenchmark/worker_coordinator/runner.py (3 lines):
	- line 412: # TODO: remove and use https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#str.removeprefix
	- line 2039: # TODO: Allow to use this from (selected) regular runners and add user documentation.
	- line 2040: # TODO: It would maybe be interesting to add meta-data on how many retries there were.


osbenchmark/builder/builder.py (2 lines):
	- line 151: # TODO: Do we need to expose this as a separate command as well?
	- line 355: # TODO: This is implicitly set by #load_provision_config() - can we gather this elsewhere?


osbenchmark/worker_coordinator/worker_coordinator.py (2 lines):
	- line 1099: # TODO: This could be misleading given that one worker could execute more than one task...
	- line 1949: # TODO: Can we offload the parameter source execution to a different thread / process? Is this too heavy-weight?


osbenchmark/telemetry.py (1 line):
	- line 1116: # TODO Consider moving under the utils package for broader/future use?


osbenchmark/builder/launcher.py (1 line):
	- line 187: # TODO remove this when ES <8.0 becomes unsupported by Benchmark


osbenchmark/workload/loader.py (1 line):
	- line 866: # TODO #341: Should we allow this for snapshots too?