PROPOSAL.html [28:45]:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<p>
   The Java Collections Framework provides a set of abstract data
   type interfaces and implementations that offer both a wealth
   of useful functionality, and a solid foundation for extending
   that functionality.
</p>
<p>
   Many Jakarta projects have needs or design criteria that extend
   beyond the core Collections API, such as introducing new abstract
   data types (e.g., Avalon's BinaryHeap) or changing the behavior of
   existing abstract data types (e.g., Struts' FastHashMap).
</p>
<p>
   In keeping with the spirit of the Collections API and of abstract
   data types in general, these components can and should be shared
   assets.  A Commons package for abstract data types would
   encourage the development and reuse of a robust set of collections
   classes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



src/site/xdoc/proposal.xml [32:49]:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<p>
   The Java Collections Framework provides a set of abstract data
   type interfaces and implementations that offer both a wealth
   of useful functionality, and a solid foundation for extending
   that functionality.
</p>
<p>
   Many Jakarta projects have needs or design criteria that extend
   beyond the core Collections API, such as introducing new abstract
   data types (e.g., Avalon's BinaryHeap) or changing the behavior of
   existing abstract data types (e.g., Struts' FastHashMap).
</p>
<p>
   In keeping with the spirit of the Collections API and of abstract
   data types in general, these components can and should be shared
   assets.  A Commons package for abstract data types would
   encourage the development and reuse of a robust set of collections
   classes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -