_posts/2011-12-27-openoffice_grandfather_s_private_thoughts.html (149 lines of code) (raw):

--- layout: post status: PUBLISHED published: true title: OpenOffice Grandfather's Private Thoughts id: dde51ad0-808f-4c36-bd66-4fd3a79f8a2d date: '2011-12-27 17:55:52 -0500' categories: ooo tags: - openoffice.org - openoffice - aoo - apache permalink: OOo/entry/openoffice_grandfather_s_private_thoughts --- <style type="text/css"> <!--<br /> @page { margin: 0.79in }<br /> P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }<br /> A:link { so-language: zxx }<br /> --><br /> </style> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">I sent out a similar email to our mailing list before<br /> Christmas and before I took a short break to relax with my family and<br /> friends. But it's maybe worth sharing with a broader audience<br /> here on the blog.</p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Let me first tell you something about<br /> me (Juergen Schmidt=jsc) and to explain the title of this blog. I have been involved in the<br /> OpenOffice project since the beginning and have worked on the source<br /> code before when I started to work for StarDivision in 1997. So I can<br /> for sure argue that I am one of <b>many</b> grandfathers of the<br /> OpenOffice project and that the last year or better the last 16 month were<br /> not the most brilliant in the long and successful history of the<br /> OpenOffice project.</p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">A lot of misunderstanding and<br /> miscommunication led to confusion by our users and before we start<br /> in a challenging new year I would like to share some thoughts with<br /> you about the last months, my private expectations, and my wishes for<br /> the next year. </p> <p>Oracle's announcement to stop their investment<br /> in OpenOffice.org was a shock for me. Well the reason is obvious, I<br /> was paid by Oracle and worked on this project. The people who know me<br /> from the past know that I am a 100% OpenOffice.org guy and I always<br /> appreciated to work on this project and together with our community.<br /> I always felt as part of the overall community. I know the reasons<br /> that were responsible for the LibreOffice fork and the split of the<br /> community and I have to confess that I can understand it. But I<br /> didn't like how it was done. If Oracle would have done this step 6<br /> month earlier I am sure we wouldn't have this fork and we wouldn't<br /> have this split of the community. We would potentially still have the<br /> go-oo fork which was the foundation for LibreOffice but that is<br /> something different. Anyway it is as it is at the moment and we will see<br /> how it moves forward in the future. </p> <p>The grant to Apache was<br /> at least the appropriate signal that OpenOffice.org as a project will<br /> never die. The brand is too big and too important, the opportunities<br /> around the product and the overall eco-system are great and I am very<br /> sure that the project will continue and will be hopefully shining<br /> brighter than before. </p> <p>But a lot of work was and still is in<br /> front of us. We had to deal with a lot of things in parallel where<br /> other derivative projects didn't had to deal with at least not in public. We had to migrate the whole OpenOffice.org infra-structure to<br /> Apache and had to ensure that it worked. I think we were very<br /> successful here and have migrated nearly everything we need from a<br /> technical perspective.</p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Our mission was to migrate as much as<br /> possible of the available stuff on <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">www.openoffice.org</a><br /> and at least save it for later use. I think we did it! Thanks to all<br /> who made this possible. And we can concentrate in the future on some<br /> structural and conceptual redesign of the main portal page<br /> <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">www.openoffice.org</a> to<br /> provide the information to our users that they need to find the<br /> product, to find more information like help, discussion forums, and to<br /> find the way in the community if they want to do more etc. </p> <p>We<br /> couldn't simply use the code as it was and could continue with the<br /> development as in the past because of the different license. A huge<br /> challenge that is still ongoing and where I had many problems at<br /> the beginning. It is not easy to explain why you remove something and<br /> replace it with something new that provide the same functionality but<br /> is under a more appropriate license. It's simply boring work and no<br /> developer really likes it. But is a prerequisite for Apache and in the<br /> end it is better for our eco system because the Apache license is<br /> much friendlier for business usage as any other open source license.<br /> As an individual developer I don't care too much about all the<br /> different open source licenses, as long as the work I do is good for<br /> the project and in the end for our users. But I learned that the<br /> Apache license can be a door opener for more contributors and more<br /> engagement of companies. I think that is important and I am confident<br /> that it will help to drive our project forward. </p> <p>And not<br /> everything is bad. With the IP cleanup we really cleaned up many<br /> things and Armin's replacement for the svg import/export is the best<br /> solution we ever had for OpenOffice and with the biggest potential<br /> for further improvements. All this is really motivating for the<br /> future! </p> <p>Well we had a lot of noise and communication problems<br /> on our mailing lists and I think we missed transmitting the message<br /> that OpenOffice.org has found a new home under the Apache foundation<br /> and we have missed communicating the progress we have made in the<br /> pubic. <i>We can do much better in the future!</i> And I am looking forward<br /> to working with all of you on this communication part in the future. We<br /> don't have to be shy, we work on a great project with a great product<br /> and we should have enough to communicate and to share in the public<br /> (not only on our mailing list but on all the modern and very useful<br /> media like Facebook, Google+, twitter, ...) </p> <p>For the next<br /> year I expect that we find our way to guide and control our project a<br /> little bit better. I expect our first release early next year and<br /> hopefully a second one later in the year where we can show that we are<br /> able to drive the project forward and that we are able to create and<br /> establish a vibrant and living community. </p> <p>I wish that we can<br /> gain trust in the project and in the Apache way and that it is a good<br /> move forward. Our users simply want the best free, open source office<br /> productivity suite and they don't care about the different licenses.<br /> Enterprise users would like to see a huge and working community with<br /> the participation of a lot of different companies or at least their<br /> employees working on the project. We all know that such a huge and<br /> successful project can only work if we have individual community<br /> members as well as full-time community members. Important is the <b>WE</b><br /> and the <b>TOGETHER</b> that makes open source projects successful.</p> <p>I heart voices and read emails where people said that Apache<br /> is not able to manage such a huge end user oriented project with all<br /> the necessary things. A strong statement, isn't it. At the beginning I have to confess that I also had doubts and wasn't sure. But as I<br /> have mentioned in an earlier post on our mailing list, I have seen and got<br /> the necessary signals over time that Apache is willing to listen and<br /> is open for changes as well if they make sense for the overall<br /> success of our project and if these changes are aligned with the<br /> overall Apache principles. And I think that is fair enough for all.</p> <p>The move to Apache is a big challenge for all of us. Apache<br /> had many very successful projects but none of these projects has<br /> such a huge end-user focus like OpenOffice. And of course OpenOffice<br /> is no small or new project. No it is one of biggest and most<br /> successful open source projects ever. And the migration was and is<br /> not easy. But we the community can do it, we as individuals,<br /> everybody can help and we together will do it! </p> <p>And the Apache<br /> way and the Apache license have proven in the past and with many<br /> successful projects that it is a good way and a good license to<br /> achieve this.</p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">For our users I wish that press people<br /> will do a better job in the future to research facts and stories<br /> better or if they prefer to write articles based on first-hand<br /> information that they contact the Apache OpenOffice project<br /> directly. We are here and can help with information! That will<br /> definitely help to avoid further confusion about the future of<br /> OpenOffice.</p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Enough from me for now and I hope that I haven't bothered you with my private thoughts. I wish you all a<br /> happy new year, enjoy these days, take your own break too, load your<br /> batteries for our next challenge in 2012. </p> <p>Regards </p> <p>Juergen</p>