tester/src/main/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/tester/rfc4408-tests.yml [1329:1337]:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    comment: >-
      There is controversy over ip4 mapped connections.  RFC4408 clearly
      requires such connections to be considered as ip4.  However,
      some interpret the RFC to mean that such connections should *also*
      match appropriate ip6 mechanisms (but not, inexplicably, A or MX
      mechanisms).  Until there is consensus, both
      results are acceptable.
    spec: 5/9/2
    helo: mail.example.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



tester/src/main/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/tester/rfc4408-tests.yml [1345:1353]:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    comment: >-
      There is controversy over ip4 mapped connections.  RFC4408 clearly
      requires such connections to be considered as ip4.  However,
      some interpret the RFC to mean that such connections should *also*
      match appropriate ip6 mechanisms (but not, inexplicably, A or MX
      mechanisms).  Until there is consensus, both
      results are acceptable.
    spec: 5/9/2
    helo: mail.example.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



