void update_cpu_features()

in kernel/cpufeature.c [1118:1228]


void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
			 struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
			 struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot)
{
	int taint = 0;

	/*
	 * The kernel can handle differing I-cache policies, but otherwise
	 * caches should look identical. Userspace JITs will make use of
	 * *minLine.
	 */
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0, cpu,
				      info->reg_ctr, boot->reg_ctr);

	/*
	 * Userspace may perform DC ZVA instructions. Mismatched block sizes
	 * could result in too much or too little memory being zeroed if a
	 * process is preempted and migrated between CPUs.
	 */
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_DCZID_EL0, cpu,
				      info->reg_dczid, boot->reg_dczid);

	/* If different, timekeeping will be broken (especially with KVM) */
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_CNTFRQ_EL0, cpu,
				      info->reg_cntfrq, boot->reg_cntfrq);

	/*
	 * The kernel uses self-hosted debug features and expects CPUs to
	 * support identical debug features. We presently need CTX_CMPs, WRPs,
	 * and BRPs to be identical.
	 * ID_AA64DFR1 is currently RES0.
	 */
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64dfr0, boot->reg_id_aa64dfr0);
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64dfr1, boot->reg_id_aa64dfr1);
	/*
	 * Even in big.LITTLE, processors should be identical instruction-set
	 * wise.
	 */
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64isar0, boot->reg_id_aa64isar0);
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64isar1, boot->reg_id_aa64isar1);
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64isar2, boot->reg_id_aa64isar2);

	/*
	 * Differing PARange support is fine as long as all peripherals and
	 * memory are mapped within the minimum PARange of all CPUs.
	 * Linux should not care about secure memory.
	 */
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64mmfr0, boot->reg_id_aa64mmfr0);
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64mmfr1, boot->reg_id_aa64mmfr1);
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64mmfr2, boot->reg_id_aa64mmfr2);

	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64pfr0, boot->reg_id_aa64pfr0);
	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64pfr1, boot->reg_id_aa64pfr1);

	taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, cpu,
				      info->reg_id_aa64zfr0, boot->reg_id_aa64zfr0);

	if (id_aa64pfr0_sve(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ZCR_EL1, cpu,
					info->reg_zcr, boot->reg_zcr);

		/* Probe vector lengths, unless we already gave up on SVE */
		if (id_aa64pfr0_sve(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)) &&
		    !system_capabilities_finalized())
			vec_update_vq_map(ARM64_VEC_SVE);
	}

	/*
	 * The kernel uses the LDGM/STGM instructions and the number of tags
	 * they read/write depends on the GMID_EL1.BS field. Check that the
	 * value is the same on all CPUs.
	 */
	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) &&
	    id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1)) {
		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_GMID_EL1, cpu,
					      info->reg_gmid, boot->reg_gmid);
	}

	/*
	 * If we don't have AArch32 at all then skip the checks entirely
	 * as the register values may be UNKNOWN and we're not going to be
	 * using them for anything.
	 *
	 * This relies on a sanitised view of the AArch64 ID registers
	 * (e.g. SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), so we call it last.
	 */
	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
		lazy_init_32bit_cpu_features(info, boot);
		taint |= update_32bit_cpu_features(cpu, &info->aarch32,
						   &boot->aarch32);
	}

	/*
	 * Mismatched CPU features are a recipe for disaster. Don't even
	 * pretend to support them.
	 */
	if (taint) {
		pr_warn_once("Unsupported CPU feature variation detected.\n");
		add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
	}
}