deepseek-ai/LPLB

Rules of thumb, not measurements: one man-year rebuilds about 10,000 lines of main code (design, testing and coordination included), and keeping a code base alive takes about 15% of its rebuild value per year (20 man-years of rebuild value need about 3 man-years of maintenance every year). Your changes are remembered in this browser for every report.

Duplication

<1%good

of cleaned main code is duplicated

Complex units

0%good

of unit code has McCabe index > 25

Long units

71%high

of unit code is in units > 50 lines

Large files

39%high

of main code is in files > 500 lines

Goals

4 / 4good

controls within the desired range

Where to look first

The most complex main files (no git history, so change frequency is unknown).

1
plugin.cpp
csrc/
McCabe 30582 LOC
2
eplb.py
lplb/
McCabe 10114 LOC
3
planner.py
lplb/
McCabe 9178 LOC
4
run_ep16_cube8p2e.py
scripts/
McCabe 274 LOC

Explore all files →

Standard analyses:
		Main Code: 1,486 LOC (8 files) = CPP (39%) + CU (31%) + PY (24%) + YAML (3%) + H (<1%) Secondary code: Test: 281 LOC (3); Generated: 0 LOC (0); Build & Deploy: 239 LOC (6); Other: 58 LOC (1);
		Duplication: <1%
		File Size: 0% long (>1000 LOC), 29% short (<= 200 LOC)
		Logical Component Decomposition: primary (4 components)
		Goals: Keep the system simple and easy to change (4)

Experimental analyses (less reliable heuristic analyses):
		Unit Size: 27% long (>100 LOC), 19% short (<= 10 LOC)
		Conditional Complexity: 0% complex (McCabe index > 50), 49% simple (McCabe index <= 5)
		Static Component Dependencies: primary (4 components)